Data access
Which data can the system use?
- List of approved sources and permitted uses
- Collection of only the personal data needed
- Retention and deletion rules
- Access permissions by role
Governance and operations
We define which data the AI system can access, how its output is tested and which actions require approval. We also agree who handles errors, updates and support after launch.
Controls to agree
We review source permissions, model selection, action limits and support responsibilities with your IT, security and business teams. Requirements are documented for the specific project.
Data access
AI models
Actions and approvals
Source and change history
Support and maintenance
Boundaries
Record excluded sources and actions, unsupported markets and cases that must use the manual process. A missing permission must stop the relevant action.
Human review
A research summary and a public product claim have different consequences. The following scenarios describe possible review arrangements; your policy owners approve the actual design.
The system may draft a summary with citations. An analyst reviews the source material before using it to support a material recommendation.
The system may generate drafts from approved inputs. Brand, local-market and rights reviewers approve the assets before they leave the production queue.
The system may retrieve evidence and route a draft. Authorised specialists retain responsibility for approving claims and required disclosures.
The system may compare scenarios. The budget owner reviews assumptions, uncertainty and limits before authorising any reallocation.
Evaluation before release
Representative test cases should include missing data, conflicting sources, expired rights, unsupported claims and requests outside scope. Measure whether the system stops or escalates correctly as well as whether it produces a useful result.
After launch, monitor quality, cost, response times and manual overrides. Define which changes require reevaluation and who can pause the workflow.
Sample approval record
This illustrative record shows how a claim moves through review. It is sample interface data, not a live client record or a certification.
The asset version and permitted market are recorded.
Three approved sources are linked to the draft claims.
One claim falls outside the approved wording. Publication remains blocked.
The reviewer amends the claim and approves the revised version.
The approved version, reviewer and evidence are retained together.